Lead Paint Removal >> How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint

Task-specific exposure monitoring consisted of 30-min samples each measuring the exposure associated with work on one visually uniform paint surface, using one specific surface preparation work method. Task-specific exposure monitoring of exposures to construction workers allows more specificity in assessing the different sources of exposure, and more clearly documents the need for How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint task-specific controls.

These samples were analyzed for both lead and total dust. The lead analysis allowed a comparison of work methods by mean lead exposure levels. However, How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint because this was not a controlled 'sideby-side' comparison of different work methods on the same surface, it was expected that this comparison would be confounded by the varying concentration of lead in the different paint surfaces. 

The intent of analyzing the samples for total dust was to eliminate the confounding effect of different lead paint concentrations. By measuring the 'dustiness' of the different work methods, How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint the range of potential airborne lead exposures associated with each work method could be compared directly. 

Short-term task-specific sampling was conducted following NIOSH Method 7300, except that 0.8mm polyvinyl (PVC) membrane filters were used instead of the standard MCE filters. PVC filters were How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint used to allow reliable gravimetric determination of filter weight for total dust analysis. The target airflow rate for these samples was 4 L/min; the target duration was 30 min. 

Laboratory analysis by WOHL followed NIOSH Method 0500 (Gravimetric total dust) and NIOSH Method 7300.(18) The LOQ for lead at the target sample volume of 120 L was 4 mg/m3 ; for total dust it was 1250 mg/m3 . Paint Surface Assessment Bulk How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint samples were collected of each visually uniform paint surface disturbed by the surface preparation work. 

Bulk paint chip sampling was conducted following the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 1994 guidance document.(20) Laboratory analysis was How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint conducted for lead content by WOHL using in-house methods based on NIOSH Method 7300 (Elements by ICP).(18) WOHL was ELLAP-accredited for lead paint chip analysis. 

Duplicate paint chip samples were taken and analyzed colorimetrically to determine which of the accumulated layers of paint contained detectable levels of lead. A handheld magnifying glass, How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint together with Lead Check Swabs produced by HybriVet Systems, Inc., Framingham, Mass. were used. The manufacturer reports that the swabs use a rhodizinate reaction to detect the presence of lead above 0.5% (5000 ppm). 

It should be noted that an EPA/ U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-funded study of the performance of chemical test kits recommended against their use for lead paint testing.(22) Frequency of Surface Preparation Methods As part of the California Painters Project a How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint baseline employer questionnaire was conducted with all 21 participating contractors. 

The questionnaire assessed the frequency with which contractors used different surface preparation methods on pre-1980 buildings or metal surfaces. For each surface preparation method, the contractor was asked whether the company used the method often, How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint sometimes, or never. Data Analysis Airborne exposure data were analyzed using Epi Info Version 5.0.(23) 

In calculating summary statistics and modeling distributions, all non detectable results were assigned the value of one-half the limit of detection. All results above the limit of detection, How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint but below the limit of quantitation, were assigned the midpoint value between the limit of detection and the limit of quantitation. The contractor responses regarding the frequency with which their company used different surface preparation methods are summarized in Table I. 

The most frequently used methods were dry manual sanding, with 90% of the contractors reporting that they used it often; How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint and dry manual scraping, with 86% of the contractors reporting they used it often. Other frequently used work methods were uncontrolled power sanding (the use of a power sander that is not equipped with a vacuum attachment) and water blasting, with 38% reporting that they used these methods often. 

Full-Shift Airborne Lead Exposures In total, 25 full-shift samples were collected at 11 of the 12 job sites, each sample from a different employee. The How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint samples represent work on 18 visually uniform paint surfaces. The lead paint concentrations of these surfaces ranged from 0.04 to 42%. Analyses by rhodizinate spot test showed that the top layer of 3 of the 18 surfaces contained detectable lead content; all of the remaining surfaces contained detectable lead only in the underlying paint layers. 

The results of the 25 full-shift samples, How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint when calculated as 8- hr time-weighted averages (8-hr TWAs), ranged from 0.8 to 550 mg/m3 . The arithmetic mean was 57 mg/m3 , above the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 mg/m3 (GM 5 18 mg/ m3 , GSD 5 3.7). Six of the 25 samples (24%) were above the OSHA PEL. 

All 6 of the How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint samples that exceeded the PEL represented work shifts that involved dry manual sanding or uncontrolled power sanding, whereas only 9 of the 19 sample results below the PEL represented work shifts that involved use of these methods. The 2 highest full-shift air samples (310 and 550 mg/m3 ) were the result of dry manual sanding on a surface that tested 18% lead and contained detectable lead in the top layer of paint. 

Short-Term Airborne Lead Exposures Fifty-eight 30-min task-specific samples were collected at 11 of the 12 job sites, from 25 different employees. The How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint samples represent work on 20 visually uniform paint surfaces. The lead paint concentrations of these surfaces ranged from 0.04 to 23%. 

Analyses by rhodizinate spot test showed that the top layer of 3 of the 20 surfaces contained detectable lead content; How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint all of the remaining surfaces contained detectable lead only in the underlying paint layers. The 30-min lead exposure results by work method are presented in Table II. The arithmetic mean results for heat gun, wet sanding, and open flame burning were below 10 mg/m3 . 

The mean result for HEPA-exhausted power sanding was 33 mg/m3 ; the mean result for dry manual scraping was 71 mg/m3 . In comparison, How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint the mean results for dry manual sanding (420 mg/m3 ) and uncontrolled power sanding (580 mg/m3 ) were much higher. To partially address the confounding effect of varying lead paint content.

Table III provides results for the same data for four work methods categorized by the percentage of lead in the paint being removed. This How Painting Pros Deal With Lead Paint allows a better comparison of the lead exposures associated with these methods.

Water Damage From Leaking Water Heater

Water heater leaks are usually quite obvious and you will discover substantial amounts of water on the floor around your heater. Normally, the first sign of a heater problem is water dripping from the bottom of the jacket. This indicates that the tank has corroded through. The cure may be installati  read more..

Who Cleans Apartments That Have Been Trashed

Occupancy under a rental agreement covering premises used as part of a transitional or supportive housing program that is sponsored or operated by a public corporation or by a nonprofit corporation and that provides shelter and related support services intended to improve the occupant's opportunity   read more..

Floodplain

How are communities involved in the Flood Damage Floodplain Insurance Study process? Prior to engaging community officials, FEMA coordinates with other Federal agencies (e.g., U.S. Corps of Engineers) to identify and gather existing data that may inform FIS development. 

FEMA then hold  read more..

How To Help The Spouse Of A Hoarder

An area that needs more research is how hoarding may prevent individuals from marrying and having families. If a person struggling with hoarding is single, how are they able to date if they are unable to bring the person over to their home? Also, finding a partner who will tolerate the hoarding for   read more..

Asbestos Testing

Asbestos might still be located in many different structural materials and products, in spite of their age. Consequently, the only way to ultimately know is to have samples of the material in question analyzed. Check your local health office for reports on sampling and testing for more   read more..

How To Clean Fire Damaged Electronic Circuits

Silicone outgasses and is a concern even in a cable configuration where the outer jacket can protect the system from small amounts of enclosed outgassing material. Current product typically contains relatively large quantities of silicone. The Gore-Tex®construction has not yet been evaluated. Th  read more..

Carpet Cleaning Tips

Ground Elevations Corresponding to Inland Limits of V Zones and Coastal A Zones (based on 1 percent annual chance stillwater elevations published by FEMA, October 3, 2005) 1 Percent Annual Chance Stillwater Elevation (ft NGVD)Jackson, Gulf of Mexico - Jackson, Back Bay - Harrison, Gulf of Mexico - H  read more..

Where Do Hurricane Come From

Charlotte Harbor, Florida Hurricane Charley came to Charlotte Harbor one Friday, with winds up to 114 mph, leaving the community stunned. Buildings were destroyed, and streets were filled with debris and downed power lines. While the storm was swirling through town, Wind Damage Where Do Hurricane Come From  30 newspaper  read more..

Remove Lead Paint From Concrete

Lead is one of the most significant and widespread environmental hazards for children in Maryland. Children are at greatest risk from birth to age six while their neurological systems are developing. Sustained exposure to lead can cause long lasting neurological damage or death. Effects of sustained  read more..

Frozen Pipe Burst Prevention

Cold Weather TipsGuard Against Cold DraftsSince most water meters and pipes are located in unheated areas, they are vulnerable when temperatures dip below freezing. Even a small draft of cold air through a cracked basement window, Water Damage Frozen Pipe Burst Prevention foundation or sill during extremely cold periods could  read more..